India’s Evolving AML and CFT Frameworks
India has strengthened its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing frameworks, achieving broad compliance with global standards. Yet gaps in enforcement, inter-agency coordination, and judicial capacity highlight the critical role of technology, oversight, and institutional reform in safeguarding financial integrity and fostering sustainable growth.
Efforts in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CFT) have been an imperative part of economic growth and security in India. This field continues to evolve, driven by technology, legal measures, and law enforcement action to tackle financial crime. India has actively and steadily strengthened its AML and CFT systems, and this article aims to discuss the progress made to date and the financial strategy for the future.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental organization that establishes global standards to address challenges related to money laundering and terrorist financing, recently conducted a Mutual Evaluation Report (MER) on India in 2024. The MER report provides an assessment of a state’s AML and CFT frameworks as well as overall compliance systems, identifying issues and recommendations to improve financial intelligence, cooperation, strategy, and operations, thus reducing financial crime. The MER report highlighted that India demonstrated overall strong technical compliance standards, yet underlined that India needs to improve in certain areas, such as preventive measures and supervision mechanisms (Table 1).
Table 1: Key AML/CFT Compliance Indicators for India (FATF, 2024)

The outcomes of the report and the indicators highlight some of the challenges in establishing robust AML/CFT frameworks in the most populous country in the world. This includes, for example, considerable backlogs faced by the regulatory body and legal system in India, which create prolonged timelines and court procedural issues that delay eventual prosecution and may allow criminals to evade justice. In addition, regulatory agencies such as the Reserve Bank of India, the Financial Intelligence Unit of India, and the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), which are three key players in the Indian financial system, have often struggled with coordination and intelligence sharing, which further prevents timely progress in investigations. Such regulatory issues can result in increased costs for enhanced compliance efforts and for AML systems conducting customer due diligence and data analytical verification. A potentially heavy volume of suspicious transaction reports (STRs), without commensurate investigative support from law enforcement, can further limit the capacity and capability of compliance efforts.
Stronger inter-agency coordination can be established through mutual agreements, joint task teams, and the development of an accessible information data platform, which can result in enhanced AML/CFT and overall compliance efforts. In addition, reforming judicial systems by granting crime judges and prosecutors the authority to fast-track financial cases will enable high-priority AML and CFT cases to be addressed. This can be done through training legal agencies, judges, lawyers, and experts to improve their knowledge of financial crime and speed up convictions and the recovery of assets. This also includes calling for stronger penalties for AML, CFT, and compliance failings (Mittal, 2024).
India’s AML and CFT frameworks have strengthened considerably and now align with global standards, which is important for maintaining local and international financial institutions and operational integrity. However, the transition from compliance on paper to on-the-ground execution remains a work in progress. By enhancing enforcement, embracing advanced technologies, and expanding oversight across financial and non-financial sectors, India can build a more resilient defense against illicit finance that benefits its financial institutions and national economic security.
Technological advances, such as real-time data analytics, machine learning, AI-based transaction monitoring, and blockchain tracing, play a vital role in fighting financial economic crime. These tools not only increase detection accuracy and reduce false positives but can also boost efficiency. Financial institutions and law enforcement can analyze huge numbers of digital transactions to spot suspicious patterns quickly, making it possible to detect threats proactively instead of reactively. Better detection helps stop illegal funds from entering and undermining the financial system, while also increasing confidence in financial integrity, a key factor for stable growth and attracting investment. In this way, modern technology supports both financial stability and economic confidence, which are fundamental for a strong economy (PwC, 2024).

India’s ED (Figure 1) highlights that fraud, racketeering, and corruption are the major causes of money laundering and financial crimes, likely because these offenses yield large amounts of illegal money that must be concealed through complex transactions within the financial system (Directorate of Enforcement, 2025). The FATF MER points out that India’s main risks for money laundering arise from fraud, including cyber-enabled schemes, and corruption, showing how widespread economic crime fuels incentives and methods for moving illicit funds (FATF, 2024).
Investigative data also reveal that about 30% of ED cases involve bank fraud, emphasizing how often financial trickery and misuse of credit systems generate illicit proceeds that need to be laundered. Furthermore, the ED’s annual reports stress that corruption weakens governance, wastes public resources, and supports networks that depend on money laundering, highlighting why tackling corruption is a primary enforcement goal (Pankaj, 2025).

India’s GDP has steadily continued to grow (Macrotrends, 2025). Although data linking India’s GDP growth to AML and CFT efforts is limited, research has revealed that strong financial integrity regimes, including AML and CFT frameworks, boost economic confidence, foreign investment, and financial sector development. Effective AML regulations are associated with reduced illicit financial flows, increased investor trust, and higher FDI, all supporting economic growth (AlQudah et al., 2025). India’s 2024 FATF MER notes significant progress in its AML and CFT framework, enhancing transparency and expanding formal financial systems to aid economic development.
Generally, countries with robust AML and CFT enforcement demonstrate stronger reputations, better access to global markets, and more resilient financial institutions, which contribute to sustainable growth. In contrast, weak enforcement can distort lending, reduce trust, and deter foreign investment (FATF, 2024). Hence, India’s continuing economic growth is a positive indicator of AML, CFT, and compliance systems.
India’s progress in AML and CFT shows strong intent, expanding legal frameworks, and increasing alignment with global standards, enhancing financial integrity. The main takeaway is that effective enforcement, new technology, and cross-institution collaboration are as vital as robust laws. High-profile and continuing white-collar crimes highlight the need for faster action.
Recent steps include regulating virtual asset providers, tighter supervision of financial institutions, and better use of financial intelligence. Six key steps that India could take to strengthen AML/CFT measures further would be to speed up prosecutions, (ii) improve conviction rates, (iii) enhance data sharing, (iv) adopt technologies like AI-driven analytics, (v) expand oversight to non-financial sectors, and (vi) strengthen public-private partnerships.
Consistent execution of these reforms could boost investor trust, drive sustainable growth, and further reinforce India’s role in the global financial system.
Bibliography
- AlQudah, A., Hailat, M. and Setabouha, D. (2025) ‘Money laundering in global economies: How economic openness and governance affect money laundering in the EU, G20, BRICS, and CIVETS’, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6), p. 319. doi:10.3390/jrfm18060319.
- Directorate of Enforcement (2025) Annual report FY 2024–2025. Available at: https://enforcementdirectorate.gov.in/sites/default/files/2025-05/Annual_Report_24-25.pdf.
- FATF (2024) India’s measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. September. Available at: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/India-MER-2024.html.
- Macrotrends (2025) India GDP. Available at: https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/ind/india/gdp-gross-domestic-product.
- Mittal, R. (2024) ‘Key priorities for enhancing compliance by financial institutions amid latest FATF findings’, LexisNexis Risk Solutions. Available at: https://risk.lexisnexis.com/insights-resources/article/fatf-new-findings-aml-cft-compliance-india.
- Pankaj, J. (2025) ‘Datanomics: Bank fraud accounts for 30% of cases investigated by ED’, Business Standard, August. Available at: https://www.business-standard.com/economy/analysis/datanomics-bank-fraud-accounts-for-30-of-cases-investigated-by-ed-125080801161_1.html.
- PwC (2024) PwC’s Global Economic Crime Survey 2024 – India outlook. October. Available at: https://www.pwc.in/pwcs-global-economic-crime-survey-2024-india-outlook.htm
