Colombia’s Electoral Stress Test of State Capacity
Colombia’s recent election confirms Latin America’s broader shift to the right, but its real
significance lies in the daunting domestic challenge the new president is facing. Managing high
public expectations in a polarised, economically constrained country—now compounded by
the consequences of a major earthquake—may prove even trickier than anticipated.
Gustavo Petro’s Legacy: A Vote for Change
The razor-thin margin in the presidential election highlights a deeply divided electorate: the far-right outsider Abelardo De La Espriella narrowly defeated the left-wing candidate by less than 1% in the 2026 runoff. While this echoes regional trends, Colombia’s rightward turn reflects disillusionment with Petro’s presidency, especially his ‘Paz Total’ (Total Peace) policy. Intended to foster demobilisation through negotiation, the strategy instead fragmented armed groups, intensified competition, and increased violence and non-state actor control (Breda, 2026b; Zuleta, 2026). The retreat from forced coca eradication and unclear policies on illicit economies ceded further ground to armed groups. Military interventions failed to address the underlying absence of the state (Zuleta, 2026), and violence emerged or resurfaced in several regions, intensifying a cycle of electoral violence that has long marred Colombia (AFP, 2026b). The accompanying timeline traces this fragmentation in detail: from the FARC-EP’s 2016 demobilisation through the emergence of the EMC and Segunda Marquetalia, to the wave of internal splits, EMBF, Comuneros del Sur, Los Cabuyos, that multiplied between 2023 and 2025. In the meantime, paramilitary-descendant groups that engaged in negotiations with the leftist government through the Total Peace policy also experienced major splinters -as shown in the second timeline- and renewed competition, resulting in a surge of violence from and between those groups. The pattern echoes the fragmentation seen among Petro’s mandate guerrilla splinters and relocated into some of the country’s most visited destinations, giving insecurity a far more visible face for voters and foreign investors alike.
Economically, the toll was also steep: foreign direct investment dropped by a third from 2022, the IMF withdrew its precautionary credit line in 2025 due to fiscal concerns, and Colombia lost its investment-grade rating with two major agencies (Kristie Pellechia Loicano, 2026). The apparent state withdrawal from troubled regions and a deteriorating fiscal position shaped the 2026 vote. Instead of voting for a defined ideology, Colombians seemed to have voted more against a government whose main policies visibly unravelled. Crucially, the grievances that fueled the 2021 Estallido, namely territorial neglect, inequality and distrust in state institutions, remained unresolved (Breda, 2026b): the 2026 result can be read as a second, opposite-signed expression of the same discontent.
The Fragmentation of Colombian Organised Armed Groups (GAO) Over Time
From Electoral Victory to Effective Governance
A critical question is: What kind of mandate does the new president believe he has received? De la Espriella’s slim victory does not give him a strong margin to enact sweeping changes. He lacks a legislative majority and has yet to build the coalitions needed to implement his ambitious fiscal agenda and deregulate the economy. His widely-touted ‘Miracle Homeland’ policy envisions shrinking the state apparatus by 40% to spur 7% growth. However, 90% of the national budget is protected by constitutional or legal guarantees (CARF, 2025), and Colombia faces a structural deficit of 6.5% of GDP (Caparroso, 2026) alongside a rapidly growing public debt. The 2027 budget alone faces a 30 trillion peso shortfall, meaning the promised cuts are largely unworkable without major legislative reforms. This gap between promise and legal reality is the crux of the matter: a mandate that cannot be delivered through ordinary budgeting pushes the executive toward exceptional instruments, which is precisely where institutional conflict begins.
De La Espriella has signalled a preference for ruling by executive decree and states of emergency, raising concerns about legal clashes with Colombia’s core institutions – namely the Constitutional Court and the State Council (Atlantic Council, 2026). His administration’s early moves to distance itself from its predecessor have already exposed the country to new risks, stoked general discontent, and paralysed government operations amid a devastating earthquake. In a country where distrust in institutions was already a driver of the 2021 unrest, governing by exception risks feeding the very frustration the mandate was meant to answer.
The Earthquake: An Immediate Test
A 7.4 magnitude earthquake struck Colombia within De La Espriella’s first week in office, severely undermining his capacity to deliver on campaign promises. The disaster killed over 300 people, left 4449 injured, 240 missing (Başhoruz, 2026), and affected 16 departments and hundreds of municipalities (UNGRD, 2026). While the government showed some responsiveness, its crisis management drew criticism for initial refusals of international aid and poor coordination during the critical 72-hour window (Zegarra, 2026; Arcienagas, 2026). While the earthquake struck barely three days after the government settled in, the initial refusal to carry out the handover with the outgoing administration complicated efforts to structure a swift emergency response. The episode is less about the quake itself than about what it exposed: an administration whose ideological filters on foreign aid and institutional ruptures narrow its margin for error, precisely when it is needed most.
This natural disaster has become the first real test of Colombia’s state capacity and budgetary resilience. The ambitious ‘Miracle Homeland’ policy will likely collide with the realities of a massive reconstruction bill, forcing tough choices among competing priorities.
The Fragmentation of Colombian Criminal Groups Over Time
The Economic Trade-Offs of a New Direction
The president’s plan to deregulate the economy and cut government spending now faces even steeper obstacles. De La Espriella also pledged to subsidise mortgages and increase healthcare spending, further straining public finances. Analysts had already warned that his economic promises were fiscally precarious even before the earthquake (Caparroso, 2026; Villamizar, 2026),and now the earthquake has completely shattered them. The deficit is expected to climb to nearly 8% of GDP as reconstruction costs mount, and public debt is approaching 60% of GDP (Medina and Dahl, 2026). In other words, the fiscal plan De la Espriella upheld has been shattered within days of taking office.
A larger deficit inherently leads to heavier borrowing and renewed pressure on the sovereign ratings, which is why the fiscal plan matters more to investors than the physical damage itself. The shock may prove transitory in macroeconomic terms, yet lasting in terms of fiscal credibility. Covering the multi-billion-dollar reconstruction bill will require more than mere budget cuts. In other words, De La Espriella’s presidency faces one central risk: reconciling fiscal constraints with high expectations for rapid change. The opposition, initially calling for civil disobedience, has temporarily united to support earthquake recovery, but the president’s legitimacy remains fragile (ACLED, 2026).
The Iron Hand Threading a Fragile Mandate
Though the economic agenda is on hold, De La Espriella has swiftly moved to end Petro’s Total Peace policy, replacing it with a hardline security approach: “prison or death.” This has included expanded military operations and forced crop eradications, with the president publicly displaying the bodies of killed armed group fighters—turning lethal force into a political spectacle (Osorio, 2026; elDiario.es, 2026). On the other hand, a spike in violence on the Caribbean coast pushed the new administration to heavily militarise the streets of Santa Marta, prompting the ACSN to retaliate by imposing a three-day curfew on residents already reeling from the group’s attacks and confrontations (AFP, 2026a). The stakes are especially high because the ACSN extorts 95% of businesses in and around the city (Breda, 2026a); militarisation therefore risks trapping residents between state security forces and a group that already controls their livelihoods.
De la Espriella also authorised joint military operations with the United States without Senate approval, raising constitutional questions and public distrust. Early operations have already led to civilian casualties, adding to the consequences of crop eradication, militarisation, and renewed confrontations between armed forces and criminal groups. This new stance on security could foster the creation of a « permissive environment […] exposing a growing number of civilians to stigma and state-sponsored violence » (Breda, 2026b).
The decision to conduct joint operations with the U.S. without proper inquiry could further erode public trust. Since inequality, territorial neglect, and lack of faith in institutions, Colombia’s underlying issues behind Colombia’s 2021 « Estallido » (social unrest) — inequality, territorial neglect, and lack of faith in institutions—remain unresolved, merely reconfigured under a new administration (Breda, 2026b).
The Wider Political Risk
Colombia’s political shift is less about regional trends and more about a domestic reckoning with unmet expectations, fiscal crisis, and the sudden test of disaster recovery. The three pressures examined above- a mandate that outruns its legal and fiscal limits, a security strategy that trades short-term results for public trust, and a legitimacy that remains fragile converge on a single variable: expectations. De La Espriella’s government must quickly find a path between the promises of rapid change and the realities of economic and institutional constraints. The main challenge may be to avoid repeating past mistakes while inheriting the same fault lines the new administration once campaigned against.
References
ACLED (2026) Will Colombia’s earthquake strengthen or weaken De la Espriella? Available at: https://acleddata.com/expert-comment/will-colombias-earthquake-strengthen-or-weaken-de-la-espriella.
Acosta, L.J. (2024) ‘Divisions among Colombia’s EMC rebels fracture peace talks, rebel leader and government say’, Reuters, 16 April. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/divisions-among-colombias-emc-rebels-fracture-peace-talks-rebel-leader-2024-04-16/.
AFP (2026a) ‘Colombians in Santa Marta stay inside after violence wracks the city’, France 24, 24 September. Available at: https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20260924-colombians-in-santa-marta-stay-inside-after-violence-wracks-the-city.
AFP (2026b) ‘Two presidential campaign staffers killed in Colombia as elections near’, Yahoo News, 16 May. Available at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/two-presidential-campaign-staffers-killed-214204165.html.
Al Jazeera (2026) ‘At least 11 wounded by Colombia car bomb days before presidential election’, Al Jazeera, 1 August. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/1/at-least-11-wounded-by-colombia-car-bomb-days-before-presidential-election.
Álvarez, S.R. (2026) ‘Así influyó la paz total en el fortalecimiento de grupos armados en Colombia’, La Silla Vacía, 14 May. Available at: https://www.lasillavacia.com/silla-nacional/asi-influyo-la-paz-total-en-fortalecimiento-de-grupos-armados-en-colombia/.
Arcienagas, Y. (2026) ‘De la Espriella, un mes de poder en Colombia: terremoto, mano dura y una Presidencia que busca controlar el mensaje’, France 24, 6 September. Available at: https://www.france24.com/es/am%C3%A9rica-latina/20260906-de-la-espriella-un-mes-de-poder-en-colombia-terremoto-mano-dura-y-una-presidencia-que-busca-controlar-el-mensaje.
Atlantic Council (2026) Experts react: What a President Abelardo de la Espriella means for Colombia and beyond. Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/experts-react-what-a-president-abelardo-de-la-espriella-means-for-colombia-and-beyond/.
Başhoruz, A. (2026) ‘Colombie : le bilan du séisme de magnitude 7,4 atteint 331 morts’, Anadolu Agency, 26 August. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/fr/monde/colombie-le-bilan-du-s%C3%A9isme-de-magnitude-7-4-atteint-331-morts/4037590.
Breda, T. (2026a) Escalating violence threatens some of Colombia’s most visited travel destinations. ACLED. Available at: https://acleddata.com/report/escalating-violence-threatens-some-colombias-most-visited-travel-destinations.
Breda, T. (2026b) From Total Peace to ‘prison or death’: De la Espriella’s offensive in Colombia. ACLED. Available at: https://acleddata.com/expert-comment/total-peace-prison-or-death-de-la-espriellas-offensive-colombia.
Bustamente, M. (2026) ‘Présidentielle en Colombie : réformes sociales ou “paix totale”… Quel bilan pour Gustavo Petro ?’, France 24. Available at: https://www.france24.com/fr/am%C3%A9riques/20260528-presidentielle-colombie-bilan-gustavo-petro (Accessed: 15 September 2026).
Cadena, M.B. (2024) ‘Caracol Radio’, Caracol Radio, 2 April. Available at: https://caracol.com.co/2024/04/02/nueva-disidencia-en-el-valle-frente-57-yair-bermudez-quien-la-lidera/.
Caparroso, J. (2026) ‘Colombia enfrenta su peor crisis fiscal en décadas, advierte análisis de Corficolombiana’, Forbes Colombia. Available at: https://forbes.co/economia-y-finanzas/colombia-enfrenta-su-peor-crisis-fiscal-en-decadas-advierte-analisis-de-corficolombiana.
CERAC (no date) Datos del Conflicto Armado en Colombia. Available at: https://www.cerac.org.co/es/recursos/datosconflictoscolombia/ (Accessed: 15 September 2026).
El Colombiano (2026) ‘“Los Pepes”, primer grupo criminal que busca sometimiento con el gobierno de la Espriella’, El Colombiano, 2 September. Available at: https://www.elcolombiano.com/colombia/los-pepes-sometimiento-justicia-gobierno-abelardo-espriella-LG40579525.
Falcone, M. (2026) Colombia strikes the latest blow to the Latin American left. Cato Institute. Available at: https://www.cato.org/blog/colombia-strikes-latest-blow-latin-american-left (Accessed: 15 September 2026).
Fundación Paz & Reconciliación (2025) Balance de grupos armados 2025. Pares. Available at: https://www.pares.com.co/balance-de-grupos-armados-2025/ (Accessed: 15 September 2026).
Fundación Paz & Reconciliación (2026) Reconfiguración del Frente 18 de las disidencias de las FARC en Antioquia: ruptura con Calarcá y alineación con Iván Mordisco. Pares. Available at: https://www.pares.com.co/reconfiguracion-del-frente-18-de-las-disidencias-de-las-farc-en-antioquia-ruptura-con-calarca-y-alineacion-con-ivan-mordisco/.
Guerrero, D. (2026) ‘El presupuesto de Colombia sí tiene espacio para recortes, pero no donde muchos creen’, Bloomberg Línea, 10 July. Available at: https://www.bloomberglinea.com/latinoamerica/colombia/el-presupuesto-de-colombia-si-tiene-espacio-para-recortes-pero-no-donde-muchos-creen/.
InSight Crime (2011) Colombia archivos. Available at: https://insightcrime.org/es/category/noticias-crimen-organizado-colombia/ (Accessed: 15 September 2026).
International Crisis Group (2026) From “Total Peace” to iron fist: Colombia’s risky turn to hard security. Briefing no. 56. Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/brf/latin-america-caribbean/colombia-united-states/b56-total-peace-iron-fist-colombias-risky-turn-hard-security (Accessed: 15 September 2026).
Kirby, T. (2026) ‘How rescue effort is unfolding in Colombia’, NACLA, 6 September. Available at: https://nacla.org/how-the-rescue-effort-is-unfolding-in-colombia/.
Latin American Post (2026) Colombia ends endless peace talks as armed groups keep growing. Available at: https://latinamericanpost.com/americas/colombia-ends-endless-peace-talks-as-armed-groups-keep-growing/.
Latin Times (2026) ‘Violence escalates in Colombia as presidential election nears’, Latin Times, 18 June. Available at: https://www.latintimes.com/violence-escalates-colombia-presidential-election-nears-597464.
Medina, O. and Dahl, M. (2026) ‘$10B earthquake bill imperils Colombia austerity drive’, BusinessMirror, 16 August. Available at: https://businessmirror.com.ph/2026/08/16/10b-earthquake-bill-imperils-colombia-austerity-drive/.
Osorio, C. (2026) ‘De la Espriella celebra los resultados de una operación militar con cadáveres en el suelo’, El País América Colombia, 2 September. Available at: https://elpais.com/america-colombia/2026-09-02/de-la-espriella-celebra-los-resultados-de-una-operacion-militar-con-cadaveres-en-el-suelo.html.
PR Newswire (2026) ‘China has become Colombia’s reliable partner in times of uncertainty’, Yahoo Finance. Available at: https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/articles/china-become-colombias-reliable-partner-032700319.html.
Sosa, I.F. (2026) ‘Violencia y militarización de Santa Marta sobrecogió a Colombia’, Prensa Latina, 26 September. Available at: https://www.prensa-latina.cu/2026/09/26/violencia-y-militarizacion-de-santa-marta-sobrecogieron-a-colombia/.
Villalba, J. and Olaya, A. (2024) Aliados en el poder, la explicación del ascenso de “La Constru” en Colombia. InSight Crime. Available at: https://insightcrime.org/es/noticias/aliados-en-el-poder-la-explicacion-del-ascenso-de-la-constru-en-colombia/.
Villamizar, A. (2026) ‘El plan de De la Espriella para recortar el Estado un 40 % arranca con las “manos atadas”’, El Colombiano, 7 August. Available at: https://www.elcolombiano.com/negocios/recorte-gasto-estado-abelardo-de-la-espriella-IH39587438.
Zegarra, G. (2026) ‘Colombia says it will only accept rescue teams from four countries, as earthquake survival window closes’, CNN World, 14 August. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/12/americas/colombia-earthquake-aid-delay-intl-latam.
Zuleta, H. (2026) ‘La coca en Colombia: incentivos perversos y política agotada’, Razón Pública. Available at: https://razonpublica.com/la-coca-colombia-incentivos-perversos-politica-agotada/.
