Georgia’s EU Accession Freeze: Public Opinion Versus State Policy

Despite overwhelming public support for EU membership, government policy has shifted away from European integration, raising questions about Georgia’s democratic and geopolitical future.

Georgia currently stands at a crossroads characterised by a disconnect in public opinion and state policy. Despite a constitutional commitment to European integration and public support at approximately 80% for integration into the EU, in 2024 the ruling Georgian Dream party suspended accession talks until at least 2028. Combined with the restrictive ‘foreign agent’ legislation and concerns over media freedom, many observers are concerned about democratic backsliding in the country. Georgia’s alignment with EU values has declined from 70% in 2022 to just 40% as of 2025, despite being granted official EU candidate status in December 2023.

Much of the government inaction is shaped by memories of the 2008 Russo-Georgian War. The five-day conflict resulted in roughly 20% of Georgia’s internationally recognised territory falling under de facto Russian control. The breakaway South Ossetia and Abkhazia regions have been in dispute with the Tbilisi government since Georgia’s independence in 1991 and maintain a significant Russian military presence.

Georgia condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and, as part of the ‘Association Trio’ with Ukraine and Moldova, applied for EU candidate status within days of each other. Georgia has also provided over €100 million in humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Most Georgians are aware of the threat posed by Russia, yet Georgian Dream refuses to join Western sanctions against Moscow.

Their reasoning combines both historical grievances and economic strength. The government accuses the West of double standards by responding far more robustly to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine than to the 2008 war and the continued occupation of Georgian territory. From Tbilisi’s perspective, this inconsistency delegitimises Western pressure to comply with sanctions. The government states that the larger Russian economy would sustain far less damage from sanctions than Georgia, who remain reliant on Russian energy and tourism. Since the start of the war in Ukraine, over 100,000 Russians have emigrated to Georgia, and direct flights have been reinstated despite a wider European ban. Georgian imports from Russia have also risen by over 60% in this time period.

These metrics do not demonstrate strategic neutrality, but a policy of economic engagement with Moscow which facilitates Russia’s regional influence despite the invasion of Ukraine. Georgian Dream’s refusal to align with the sanctions reveals the government’s prioritisation of short-term economic gains over wider integration with Europe. This approach is eroding EU confidence in Georgia and raises concerns over its role as a potential route for Russia to avoid sanctions.

The shift from prospective EU candidate to current frozen EU accession reflects a recalibration by the government rather than a change in ambition of Georgia’s population. Statistics show continued high support for Georgia’s EU accession despite Georgian Dream’s pivot in 2024. Conversely, support for closer integration with Russia remains consistently low at around 20%. This falls below 15% within the working population. The contrast reveals a fundamental detachment between societal views and state policy.

Economic incentives are a key driver in public support for EU accession. Georgia remains among Europe’s lowest GDP per capita at approximately €10,000 in 2025, less than a quarter of the EU average which exceeds €40,000. The EU is also Georgia’s largest trading partner, creating strong incentives for further integration. Many Georgians view EU accession as the most effective route to improve rule of law, an area where the European Commission’s 2024 report highlighted serious backsliding. The commission highlighted judicial independence and civil liberties as areas of concern. Political pressure on Georgia’s judiciary means judicial independence diminishes when cases are politically sensitive.

The controversial foreign agent law introduced in 2024 labels NGOs and media receiving more than 20% of their funding from abroad as an organisation carrying out the interests of a foreign power. The bill was eventually passed after public backlash and has drawn comparisons to the anti-dissent legislation passed by Russia in 2012. Many Georgians associate EU accession as a safeguard against oligarchy and excessive state power, rather than as an external imposition.

Georgia now finds itself in a precarious strategic position. While they economically benefit from engaging with Russia, progress towards European integration has stalled. The widening gap between a government which pursues cautious and transactional foreign policy and a population which overwhelmingly looks towards Europe risks deepening domestic polarisation and further isolating Georgia from Western institutions. Moving forward it is important for the EU to maintain trade relations and diplomatic dialogue with Georgia if it wishes to preserve Tbilisi’s long-term European trajectory and ensure it doesn’t instead shift further into Moscow’s orbit.

Bibliography

Anastasiya Zavyalova and Hartwell, C.A. (2025). First year of Georgia’s ‘foreign agent’ law shows how autocracies are replicating Russian model − and speeding up the time frame. [online] The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/first-year-of-georgias-foreign-agent-law-shows-how-autocracies-are-replicating-russian-model-and-speeding-up-the-time-frame-250878.

Anon, (2025). Most Georgians support EU membership, according to latest opinion poll. [online] Available at: https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/opinion-polls/most-georgians-support-eu-membership-according-to-latest-opinion-poll/.

Anon, (2026). PM’s annual report: Georgia continues to unwaveringly support Ukraine politically and diplomatically, providing humanitarian assistance. [online] Available at: https://1tv.ge/lang/en/news/pms-annual-report-georgia-continues-to-unwaveringly-support-ukraine-politically-and-diplomatically-providing-humanitarian-assistance/.

Civil.ge (2025). EU Countries: Georgia’s Accession Process Has ‘Effectively Come to Standstill’. [online] Civil Georgia. Available at: https://civil.ge/archives/714889.

Commersant.ge. (2025). In 2025, Georgia received 1.2 million Russian tourists, occupied Abkhazia 4.6 million – UIISS. [online] Available at: https://commersant.ge/en/news/worl/in-2025-georgia-received-12-million-russian-tourists-occupied-abkhazia-46-million-uiiss [Accessed 3 Jun. 2026].

Cordell, J. (2022). From Russia with cash: Georgia booms as Russians flee Putin’s war. Reuters. [online] 5 Nov. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-with-cash-georgia-booms-russians-flee-putins-war-2022-11-05/.

Crisisgroup.org. (2026). Managing Georgia’s Turn against the EU | International Crisis Group. [online] Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/cmt/europe-central-asia/georgia/managing-georgias-turn-against-eu.

Davalou, L. (2024). Georgian prime minister suspends EU membership talks until end of 2028. [online] euronews. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/11/28/georgian-prime-minister-suspends-eu-membership-talks-until-end-of-2028.

Dickinson, P. (2021). The 2008 Russo-Georgian War: Putin’s green light. [online] Atlantic Council. Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/the-2008-russo-georgian-war-putins-green-light/.

Dnipropetrovsk Investment Agency. (2026). Georgia and Ukraine during wartime: support, solidarity, cooperation. [online] Available at: https://dia.dp.gov.ua/en/georgia-and-ukraine-during-wartime-support-solidarity-cooperation/.

Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood. (2025a). Georgia. [online] Available at: https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/countries/georgia_en.

Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood. (2025b). Georgia Report 2025. [online] Available at: https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/georgia-report-2025_en.

EU for Georgia. (2024). EU Candidate Status – What does it mean? – EU for Georgia. [online] Available at: https://eu4georgia.eu/what-does-the-eu-candidate-status-mean-to-georgia/.

Factcheck.ge. (2024). ‘Georgia’s economy has become tied to Russia.’ | Factcheck.ge. [online] Available at: https://factcheck.ge/en/story/43553-georgias-economy-has-become-tied-to-russia.

James, E. (2023). IRI Georgia Poll Finds Support for EU Accession High, Weariness of Russian Presence, Lack of Faith in Political Parties. [online] International Republican Institute. Available at: https://www.iri.org/news/iri-georgia-poll-finds-support-for-eu-accession-high-weariness-of-russian-presence-lack-of-faith-in-political-parties/.

Kachkachashvili, M., Midelashvili, E. and Yusuf, A. (2026). The silent Russian takeover of key business sectors in Georgia leaves locals sidelined. [online] Voxeurop. Available at: https://voxeurop.eu/en/russian-take-over-business-georgia/.

Khundadze, T. and Wade, R.H. (2025). Georgia in the Russo-Ukrainian war: balancing between West, Russia and China. [online] Global Policy Journal. Available at: https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/31/03/2025/georgia-russo-ukrainian-war-balancing-between-west-russia-and-china.

Mackintosh, T. (2024). Georgia protests: Thousands hit streets after government suspends EU bid. BBC. [online] 29 Nov. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62jp68p315o.

Navarro, L. (2016). Public attitudes in Georgia: Results of a April 2014 survey carried out for NDI by CRRC-Georgia. [online] Archive.org. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20171224101230/http://www.civil.ge/files/files/2014/NDI-Poll-April2014.pdf.

Osce.org. (2025). Georgia’s foreign agents legislation raises concerns over negative impact on civil society, OSCE human rights office says. [online] Available at: https://odihr.osce.org/odihr/588667.

Parliament.uk. (2026). Georgia and the War in Ukraine – Hansard – UK Parliament. [online] Available at: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2022-05-24/debates/395639B0-1D41-4B87-BDFB-278E0CB271F2/GeorgiaAndTheWarInUkraine [Accessed 3 Jun. 2026].

Tbilisi, in (2024). Georgia approves controversial ‘foreign agent’ law, sparking more protests. [online] BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-69007465.

Today, G. (2025). Overview: Georgia’s EU Accession Stalled as EU Issues Critical Assessment. [online] Georgia Today. Available at: https://georgiatoday.ge/georgias-eu-accession-stalled-as-eu-issues-critical-assessment/.

U.S. Mission OSCE (2024). Right of Reply to the Russian Federation on Georgia’s Law on Foreign Agents. [online] U.S. Mission to the OSCE. Available at: https://osce.usmission.gov/right-of-reply-to-the-russian-federation-on-georgias-law-on-foreign-agents/.

Venosta, M. (2021). The Associated Trio in action. [online] Euractiv. Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/special_report/the-associated-trio-in-action/ [Accessed 3 Jun. 2026].