Fragmented Syria and the Weight of Non-State Rule
Syria is formally under a newly formed Damascus state, but remains effectively divided. The capital controls little more than small pockets of urban land, with independent armed groups governing vast tracts (International Crisis Group, 2025). From the Kurdish-led governments in the northeast to the Islamist governments in the northwest, these regional actors have stepped into the space vacated by the weakened central state (Keser & Fakhoury, 2022). Meanwhile, economic collapse and incessant foreign military interventions further solidify instability (Daza Sierra, 2025). Millions rely on foreign aid, so it’s essential to understand these local power structures when planning policy and aid (UNICEF, 2024).
Local Governance and Limited Stability
Perhaps the most impressive feature of Syria’s divisible geography is the degree to which non-state actors have been able to create functioning local governments. In the northwest, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) rules through the Syrian Salvation Government (SSG), which has courts, schools, and markets, a type of stability to which local traders and elites are inclined to accept (Keser & Fakhoury, 2022). Although the group originated as an Islamist militant organisation, this civilian regime has introduced stability compared to Idlib, reducing lawlessness and attracting commerce (International Crisis Group, 2025).
In the north, the Democratic Autonomous Administration of Northeast Syria (DAANES), led by the Kurdish forces, was established in 2014 and places top priority on local councils, gender balance, and Arab community involvement (Daza Sierra, 2025). This is a decentralised arrangement that is the opposite of Syria’s previous experience of strict central domination. By promoting local choices and women’s leadership, the DAANES has made government more inclusive, which also helps to secure basic services like water and health.
Efforts to encircle ISIS add another layer of stability. The SDF, supported by U.S. and coalition forces, led ISIS’s territorial defeat in 2019 and continues to seize camps such as al-Hol, which holds 40,000 suspected fighters and their families (International Crisis Group, 2025). Concurrently, HTS has put down ISIS sleeper cells in northwest Syria, partly to consolidate its own security and legitimacy (Keser & Fakhoury, 2022). These multiple measures deny ISIS a chance to reassert itself, although the threat is far from eliminated.
A Patchwork of Conflicting Authorities
But such fragmentation has horrific implications. Contemporary Syria is a patchwork of competing powers, each holding its own sway and exacting its own tribute (Keser & Fakhoury, 2022). Government sovereignty in Damascus effectively ceases at the borders between it and Kurdish-held, HTS-held, and Turkish-backed-held areas (International Crisis Group, 2025). What this means, is that there is no single centre of power to oversee reconstruction, regulate border trade, or develop a national reconstruction strategy for infrastructural reconstruction.
These various centres of power also constitute a barrier to political reconciliation. Governments at the local level such as the DAANES have legitimacy based on fulfilling local community needs and working with disparate constituencies and are not going to simply relinquish power to Damascus (Daza Sierra, 2025). Similarly, HTS’s entrenched rule in Idlib would have any top-down peace deal vehemently rejected on the ground. With each locality tied to different external patrons (Turkey, Russia, or the United States) hopes for a comprehensive settlement are further out of sight (Keser & Fakhoury, 2022).
Additionally, war-based economies make things worse. Militias finance their existence through smuggling, checkpoint levies, and ad-hoc taxation, creating strong financial incentives to leave things as they are (European Parliament, 2017). It inculcates local patronage systems and supports corruption, discouraging outside investment and making it progressively harder to create a formal, transparent economy able to support long-term stability (Daza Sierra, 2025).
Opportunities for Local Governance and Engagement
However, these localized regimes of governance provide tentative optimism. The DAANES emphasis on ethnic collaboration, council-based participation, and female leadership is one that could be followed in later decentralized or federal settlements in Syria (Daza Sierra, 2025). By introducing Arab populations to productive roles, the state has managed to reduce some ethnic tensions, something that could become vital should any broader peace arrangements ever be agreed.
HTS also demonstrates how local government can emerge in extremis. The Syrian Salvation Government, formed by HTS, undertakes civilian affairs with a degree of technocratic skill that has begun to garner acceptance from many local families and merchants, despite ongoing international skepticism regarding HTS’s Islamist origins (Keser & Fakhoury, 2022). Such local governance experiments can eventually serve as the foundations for regionally autonomous zones under national patronage.
Meanwhile, international institutions have grown used to cooperating with local governments to offer essential aid. UNICEF and its partners continue to support various sectors, including WASH and child protection, in coordination with local authorities, while emphasizing the importance of active community engagement and capacity-building among local partners. (UNICEF, 2024). It keeps millions from further poverty and indirectly stabilizes local institutions, giving a minimal insulation against extremist recruitment (Daza Sierra, 2025).
Ongoing Threats and Regional Tensions
Yet, active dangers continue to menace these fragile gains. ISIS remains a proliferating insurgent network, conducting operations out of desert hideouts and keeping control in overcrowded camps like al-Hol (International Crisis Group, 2025). Local security forces and the SDF are afflicted with paucity of resources, and the prospect of a large prison escape or a coordinated attack that could potentially destabilise broad expanses of terrain anew (Daza Sierra, 2025).
In addition to the jihadist threat, Syria’s divided power structure offers constant threat of resumed conflict between competing groups. Turkish military campaigns against Kurdish-held areas have persistently pushed opposition elements and weakened DAANES rule (Keser & Fakhoury, 2022). Bi-annual clashes between Turkish-backed troops and HTS, or Arab tribesman-Kurdish relations, illustrate how fleeting local coexistence can be (International Crisis Group, 2025). Israeli attacks on Iranian-aligned targets add another layer of volatility, one that can draw in regional players and widen the conflict.
Bibliography
Aldalala’a, N. (2024). Syria’s leadership challenges: the trials ahead. RSIS Commentaries, 192-24.
Bukhari, S. R. H. (2025). Between Regionalism and Globalism: Exploring the Contemporary and Prospects of Syria in the Middle Eastern Polity. International Social Research Nexus (ISRN), 1(1), 1-17.
Daza Sierra, F. (2025). A NEW AGENDA FOR PEACE IN NORTHEAST SYRIA IN THE POST-ASSAD ERA Strategic Conflict Analysis to Strengthen Strategies for Democratic governance, Resilience and Civil Resistance. [online] Available at: https://novact.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NOVACT_Informe-Siria_ENG_v2_comprimido.pdf
European Parliament (2017). DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT The financing of the ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). [online] Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/603835/EXPO_IDA(2017)603835_EN.pdf.
Furlan, M., & Abenza, O. A. (2025). Armed Groups, Religious Leaders, and Humanitarian Norms: A Case Study of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham in Syria and Ansar Allah in Yemen. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 17(2).
International Crisis Group (2025). A Helping Hand for Post-Assad Syria . [online] Crisisgroup.org. Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/east-mediterranean-mena/syria/helping-hand-post-assad-syria.
Keser, A. and Fakhoury, F. (2022). Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) from an Insurgent Group to a Local Authority: Emergence, Development and Social Support Base. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 48(1), pp.1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2022.2082833.
Radpey, L. (2025). New Syria and Kurdish Dilemma: A New Chapter or the Same Old Story?. Institute of International and European Affairs.
UNICEF (2024). Humanitarian Situation Report No. 1. [online] Available at: https://www.unicef.org/media/160481/file/Syria-Humanitarian-SitRep-30-June-2024.pdf.
