August 15, 2025

China increases funding for BRI projects under new risk outlook

By Gabriel Lane

This article sheds light on how the unexpected rise in BRI financing fits into Beijing’s ‘small yet beautiful’ mantra.


The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has defined China’s relationship with the Global South since President Xi Jinping unveiled the strategy in September 2013. Thus, over US$1.308 trillion of funding has been allocated for BRI projects across over 140 countries. This includes around US$775 billion in construction contracts and US$533 billion in non-financial investments (Wang, 2025). Furthermore, while the BRI has advanced Chinese strategic interests globally with over US$19.1 trillion in trade exchanged between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and BRI member countries since 2013, financial sustainability concerns have long plagued BRI projects, prompting Beijing to introduce several key reforms over the last few years (Wong, 2023). Hence, driven by economic slowdown, implementation issues, and the inability of numerous BRI recipient countries to repay Chinese loans, Beijing is owed close to US$1 trillion by foreign capital in 2023. Furthermore, 80% of the debt is held by countries in ‘financial distress’, resulting in President Xi Jinping announcing a new direction for the BRI in 2021 (Patterson, 2024).

The mantra of ‘Xiao Er Mei’ (小而美), which translates to ‘small and/yet beautiful’, sums up the new vision of the Belt and Road Initiative and indicates Beijing’s effort to increase oversight of BRI projects (Li, 2023). Moreover, central to these reforms has been an attempt to tighten the regulation of Chinese overseas programmes to ensure greater fiscal prudence and more closely align the BRI with Chinese geo-strategic interests (Lane, 2025). Therefore, in line with this more cautious approach, BRI funding levels fell significantly between 2020 and 2022 compared to previous years. However, the Green Finance and Development Center’s (GFDC) most recent report highlights that BRI funding unexpectedly boomed in the first half of 2025, contrary to what many close observers predicted (Wang, 2025). Understanding this dramatic increase in the flow of Chinese capital within the framework of ‘small and beautiful’ is essential, shedding light upon Beijing’s strategic and economic calculations at a time when the international trade system faces a period of unprecedented disruption.

 

2025 BRI investment breaks records

According to the GFDC, the first half of 2025 witnessed the most notable investment for any six-month period in the BRI’s history, with an additional US$66.2 billion in construction contracts awarded in addition to close to US$57.1 billion in investment (Wang, 2025). These grants and loans were primarily focused on the energy, mining, technology, and manufacturing sectors, which represent BRI’s transition from its early years of predominantly transport and connectivity projects (Lema, 2023). Indeed, investment in transport-related projects fell from a high of 28% in 2018 to its lowest-ever share of BRI funding, 7.2% of total expenditure. Meanwhile, energy and metals, and mining initiatives constituted around 35% and 20% respectively of all investment in the first six months of 2025 (Wang, 2025).

Funding for energy-related projects increased in the first half of 2025, constituting the highest-ever level of engagement with the sector since the BRI’s inception, with US$42 billion invested, a 100% increase from the first half of 2024 (Wang, 2025). Furthermore, these energy investments were distributed as US$30 billion for oil and gas and US$9.7 billion for renewable energy projects, a record high for both sectors, alongside ongoing financing of coal mining initiatives despite China not bankrolling the construction of any new coal plants since 2021 (Wang, 2025). Simultaneously, investments in the mining and metals sector, as well as technology and manufacturing, also broke records with close to US$24.9 billion and US$23.3 billion, respectively (Wang, 2025). Moreover, with regards to the destinations of BRI in the first sixth months of the year, Africa was at the top with US$39 billion (largely due to the awarding of contracts worth around US$20 billion for oil and gas processing facilities in Nigeria) whilst Central Asia ranked second with US$25 billion in investment (Wang, 2025).

Increased funding within the ‘small and beautifulmodel

Central to Chinese reforms of the BRI in recent years has been Beijing’s reduced risk appetite, with the PRC implementing significant changes to the planning, implementation, and regulation of BRI-financed projects (Engel et al, 2024). Moreover, since the pandemic, there has been a noticeable shift away from expansive ‘hard connectivity’ mega-projects primarily focused on large-scale transportation infrastructure to low-risk, high-yield ‘soft connectivity’ programmes with more immediate results and returns on investment. Thus, this drive to reduce corruption, strengthen risk assessments, and more closely coordinate BRI investments with China’s strategic interests is also evidently reflected in changes in development financing models adopted by Beijing in recent years (Parks et al, 2023). Indeed, Chinese financial institutions have become increasingly risk-averse since the pandemic, with observers noting that loan volumes, deal sizes, and credit exposure reduced markedly following 2020. However, the first six months of 2025 signal an important deviation from this pattern of more hesitant investment (Tan, 2024).

 

Contrary to the mantra Xiao Er Mei, BRI deal sizes in the first half of the year reached a record high, 200-300% larger than the last decade, according to the GFDC. This was partly due to large-scale projects in Nigeria and Kazakhstan (Wang, 2025). Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognise that the financing models of these larger deals are less risky than earlier, more open-ended BRI loans, with a majority of new costly infrastructure projects paid for with resource-backed loans rather than direct fiscal exchanges, leaving Beijing less vulnerable to losing its investment (Landry and Tang, 2025). The GFDC also reports that while resources are used as collateral in recent large BRI deals concerning the construction of energy infrastructure, when it comes to the mining and tech sectors, Chinese actors appear to favour equity-based investments instead, indicating a greater risk appetite when engaging with such industries (Wang, 2025).
Moreover, international economic instability is potentially prompting further increases in BRI funding in the coming months. Thus, with the goal of supporting Chinese supply chains and shoring up international export markets, it will be intriguing to watch how Beijing’s more cautious risk appetite influences future projects.

 

Bibliography

In this Section

About the Author

SIMILAR POSTS

Nathaniel Ellis

This article sheds light on the causes, consequences, and uncertain pathways in the aftermath of the recent uprising in Nepal. Earlier this month, Nepal experienced one of the most sudden…

Read more

Srishti Chhaya

The tectonic plates of Middle Eastern geopolitics shifted dramatically in December 2024 when Bashar al Assad boarded a plane and left Syria after five decades of his family's brutal rule.…

Read more

Kutay Kahraman

The Present Situation in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been a major focus of international political activity for many years. However, recent actions by Western countries to recognise…

Read more