India-China Relations in 2025: Between Reset and Reality
A Year of Cautious Recalibration
As 2025 draws to a close, the relationship between India and China has traced a complex arc of cautious re-engagement. Throughout this year, the two Asian giants have attempted a delicate diplomatic balancing act, moving beyond the acute tensions that followed the deadly 2020 Galwan Valley clash. Yet as the year ends, it’s clear that beneath the surface of renewed dialogue lies a landscape still marked by deep-rooted challenges: an asymmetric trade relationship, unresolved territorial disputes, and persistent mutual suspicion.
Diplomatic Breakthroughs Earlier This Year
The diplomatic reset gained decisive momentum when India’s Prime Minister met with China’s President at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Summit in Tianjin. This represented New Delhi’s first high-level engagement in Beijing since 2018, marking a watershed moment in bilateral relations. The meeting, coupled with the 24th round of the Special Representatives’ dialogue on boundary issues, signalled both nations’ willingness to compartmentalize contentious matters while pursuing pragmatic cooperation.
The year also brought concrete steps toward normalizing bilateral relations. Direct air connectivity and cross-border trade mechanisms, frozen since 2020, were scheduled for gradual restoration throughout 2025. Proposals to activate border-pass trade routes at strategic points including Lipulekh, Shipki La, and Nathu La suggested an appetite for rekindling economic ties, even as strategic rivalry persisted in the background.
The Trade Paradox: Growth Amid Deepening Imbalances
Economic data from fiscal year 2024-25 has revealed both the resilience and inherent contradictions of the India-China relationship. Bilateral trade climbed to approximately USD 127.71 billion, up from USD 118.40 billion the previous year. However, this growth masked a troubling asymmetry that became increasingly stark throughout the year.
India’s trade deficit with China expanded dramatically to roughly USD 99.2 billion in FY25. Indian exports to China totalled merely USD 14.25 billion, dwarfed by imports worth USD 113-114 billion. This lopsided equation intensified concerns in New Delhi about industrial vulnerability and excessive dependence on Chinese supply chains for critical sectors.
The trade composition highlighted India’s structural disadvantage throughout 2025. While China supplied sophisticated machinery, electronic components, solar equipment, and EV battery materials, India’s exports remained concentrated in raw materials and lower-value-added goods. This pattern reinforced an unequal economic relationship that carried strategic implications beyond mere commerce.
Mixed Results for Indian Industry
For Indian businesses, the 2025 thaw presented both opportunities and persistent challenges. Industries reliant on Chinese inputs, electronics manufacturing, renewable energy, electric vehicles, and pharmaceuticals, benefited from restored supply chains and reduced costs as the year progressed. Analysts characterized this reset as a pragmatic attempt to balance economic necessity with strategic caution. However, the persistent trade deficit and sluggish export diversification dampened optimism as the year wore on. The renewed engagement represented calculated re-entry rather than a return to pre-2020 dynamics. Indian policymakers demonstrated throughout the year that they recognized economic interdependence could not supersede strategic vulnerability, particularly when trade flows remained so heavily tilted in China’s favour.
The Border Question: Limited Progress
Despite diplomatic warmth earlier in the year, the most sensitive issue, the disputed boundary, saw only partial resolution. While late 2024 brought a troop withdrawal agreement covering specific friction points like Depsang and Demchok, the broader territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control continued to simmer throughout 2025. Multiple standoff locations persisted, representing latent flashpoints that could rapidly derail diplomatic progress.
For India’s strategic establishment, 2025 confirmed the need for clear-eyed caution. Normalization of economic and diplomatic relations could not be conflated with genuine reconciliation. The boundary issue remained the fundamental constraint on how far bilateral ties could deepen, serving as a constant reminder of the fragility underlying current engagement.
Strategic Autonomy in Practice
India’s approach throughout 2025 reflected its broader foreign policy philosophy of strategic autonomy. New Delhi simultaneously pursued economic re-engagement with Beijing while deepening partnerships with other major powers, a classic hedging strategy. This approach allowed India to capture economic benefits from Chinese trade and investment without becoming overly dependent or compromising its security interests.
In an increasingly multipolar world marked by supply chain restructuring and shifting alliances, India’s calibrated engagement with China throughout the year represented pragmatic statecraft. The goal proved to be not friendship but managed coexistence, maintaining dialogue and commerce while preserving strategic flexibility and alternative partnerships.
What the Year’s Reset Actually Delivered
Looking back at 2025, the reset offered breathing room rather than breakthrough. Economic pragmatism facilitated supply chain cooperation and cross-border commerce, but it did not resolve fundamental issues: territorial disputes, security mistrust, and economic asymmetry. The year represented tactical adjustment rather than strategic transformation. This reset unfolded amid broader global realignment, where economic dependencies were reassessed and security architectures rebuilt. For India, re-engaging China appeared driven by economic necessity and regional balance calculations. Yet it also signalled an important shift, from outright hostility toward calibrated engagement, from binary rivalry toward complex coexistence.
Lessons from the Year
For policymakers and analysts reviewing 2025, the true measure lies in observable outcomes rather than diplomatic rhetoric. Trade flows showed continued growth but deepening imbalance. Import-export compositions revealed persistent structural asymmetries. Border disengagement achieved limited progress. High-level exchanges increased but without resolving core disputes.
The year 2025 did not mark a definitive turning point in the India-China rivalry. However, it opened a new chapter, one characterized by the uneasy coexistence of pragmatism and pressure, cooperation and competition, engagement and mistrust. For observers of Asian geopolitics, this intricate dance between the dragon and elephant proved to be among the most consequential developments of the year.
Looking Ahead
As we close the books on 2025, the challenge remains clear: can India and China sustain this delicate balance into 2026 and beyond, or will structural contradictions eventually overwhelm tactical accommodations? The year demonstrated that both nations prefer managed tension to open conflict, economic pragmatism to complete decoupling. Yet it also showed that fundamental issues, territorial sovereignty, trade asymmetry, and strategic mistrust remain unresolved.
The answer to whether this reset proves durable will shape not just bilateral relations, but the broader architecture of Asian security and prosperity in the years ahead. For now, 2025 stands as a year of recalibration, neither breakthrough nor breakdown, but something more complex and precarious in between.
Bibliography
- Aljazeera (2025) ‘India committed to improving ties with China, Modi tells Xi before SCO meet’. International Trade News, Aljazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/31/india-committed-to improving-ties-with-china-modi-tells-xi-before-sco-meet
- Bajpaee, C. (2025) ‘Modi’s SCO summit visit shows China and India want to reser relations. But the ‘Dragon-Elephant Tango’will be tough’. Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/09/modis-sco-summit-visit-shows-china-and-india-want-reset relations-dragon-elephant-tango
- Chadha, S.S. (2024) ‘Negotiating the India-China Standoff: 2020-2024’. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/12/negotiating-the-india-china standoff-2020-2024?lang=en
- Embassy of India (2025) ‘Trade and Economic Relations’. Embassy of India, Beijing, China. https://eoibeijing.gov.in/eoibejing_pages/MjQ
- IBEF (2025) ‘India-China Trade’. India Brand Equity Foundation. https://www.ibef.org/indian exports/india-china-trade
- Joshi, M. (2025) ‘Diplomacy, Sanctions, and Military Might: India’s Post-Galwan Strategies in Managing China’. Observer Research Foundation (ORF). https://www.orfonline.org/research/diplomacy sanctions-and-military-might-india-s-post-galwan-strategies-in-managing-china
- MEA (2025) ‘Prime Minister participates in the 25th SCO Summit in Tianjin, China’. Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. https://www.mea.gov.in/pressreleases.htm?dtl%2F40076%2FPrime+Minister+participates+in+the+25th+SCO+Summit+in+Tianjin+China+September+01+2025
- PIB Delhi (2025) ‘Prime Minister participates in the 25th SCO Summit in Tianjin, China’. Prime Minister’s Office, Government of India. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2162574®=3&lang=2
- Srivastava, S. (2025) ‘Behind the smiles with Putin, Modi and Xi at China summit’. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/01/behind-the-beijing-smiles-with-putin-modi-and-xi.html
- NPR (2025) ‘China’s Xi and India’s Modi vow to resolve border differences at meeting in Tianjin’. https://www.npr.org/2025/08/31/nx-s1-5524173/china-xi-india-border-tianjin
