Europe’s Strategic Autonomy: Charting the Path Forward in an Era of U.S. Retrenchment

The transatlantic security landscape is undergoing dramatic shifts. As American strategic attention pivots towards the Indo-Pacific and its commitment to European security becomes increasingly conditional, European leaders face a stark reality: they must develop true strategic autonomy or accept vulnerability in an increasingly complex security environment.

This isn’t merely a theoretical debate; it’s a pressing challenge with real consequences for European security. The urgent question is whether Europe can transform ambitious rhetoric into meaningful capabilities before potentially finding itself without its traditional security guarantor.

A Widening Security Gap

European defence spending has seen notable increases in recent years, particularly following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Germany’s historic €100 billion defense fund marked a dramatic departure from decades of military restraint. Poland has emerged as a continental leader, consistently exceeding NATO’s 2% GDP spending target, while France maintains its position as Western Europe’s most significant military power.

Yet these increases, while significant, reveal troubling disparities across the continent. Many Western European nations, despite their economic strength, continue to invest well below the NATO benchmark. Even more concerning is that this spending has not yet translated into the specific capabilities Europe would need to operate independently of American support.

The Capability Conundrum

The capability gap becomes starkly apparent when examining Europe’s continued reliance on American military assets. Despite years of initiatives like the European Defence Fund and Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), Europe remains dependent on U.S. support in critical areas.

Strategic airlift capacity, essential for rapidly deploying forces, remains severely limited without American C-17s. Intelligence gathering and satellite communications still largely rely on U.S. assets. Perhaps most critically, advanced missile defence systems, now proven essential in modern warfare, remain predominantly American-provided.

Political Realities

The challenge isn’t purely military, it is fundamentally political. Public attitudes toward defence spending and strategic autonomy vary dramatically across the continent, creating a patchwork of conflicting priorities that undermines cohesive action.

Eastern European nations, perceiving an immediate threat from Russia, generally support robust defence spending but often prefer the certainty of American guarantees through NATO over untested European alternatives. Meanwhile, many Western European citizens express support for strategic autonomy in principle but show limited enthusiasm for the defence spending increases it would require.

This divergence in strategic cultures has created a political deadlock that continues to hamper meaningful progress. European leaders frequently speak of strategic autonomy while simultaneously being unwilling to make the difficult choices and accept the costs that true independence would demand.

The Crisis Readiness Test

The ultimate measure of Europe’s strategic autonomy is its ability to respond effectively to security crises without substantial American involvement. By this standard, the picture is sobering.

Military planners acknowledge that while European forces could likely handle limited regional crises, particularly in Africa or the Mediterranean, they lack the capacity for sustained, high-intensity operations against a peer competitor without U.S. support.

Industrial Independence

Strategic autonomy ultimately requires an independent defence industrial base, an area where Europe faces challenges. Despite world-class capabilities in certain domains, such as naval systems and specific aircraft types, the European defence industry remains fragmented and dependent on American technology in critical areas.

Major European defence platforms often incorporate essential American components, creating hidden dependencies that undermine claims of autonomy. Even more troubling is the continued fragmentation of European defence procurement, where national priorities frequently trump continental cooperation, despite decades of initiatives promoting consolidation.

The Path Forward

As U.S. attention increasingly shifts toward competition with China, European leaders face a closing window to transform rhetorical commitments to strategic autonomy into tangible capabilities. This will require not just increased spending but also strategically aligned investments addressing critical capability gaps.

More fundamentally, it demands political alignment between differing European security perspectives and greater public willingness to fund necessary investments.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. In an era of renewed great power competition and growing uncertainty about American security guarantees, Europe must decide whether it will develop the capabilities to secure its own interests or accept the risks of continued dependence on an increasingly distracted ally.

Europe’s journey towards strategic autonomy has shown promising developments in recent years, but the destination remains distant. The coming decade will determine whether European leaders can bridge the gap between aspiration and implementation or whether strategic autonomy will remain more slogan than reality.

Bibliography

Bergmann, M., Wall, C., Monaghan, S., & Morcos, P. (2022). ‘Transforming European Defense’. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/transforming-european-defense

Dobber, J. (2024). ‘Bye Buy European? A Liberal Take on European Preferences in EU Defence Instruments’. The Future Europe Journal, European Liberal Forum. https://feu-journal.eu/issues/issue-5/bye-buy-european-a-liberal-take-on-european-preferences-in-eu-defence-instruments/

Foy, H., & Fleming, S. (2021). ‘European Defence: The Quest for ‘Strategic Autonomy’’. The Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/f14c3e59-30bb-4686-8ba3-18ff860647e7

Helwig, N. (2021). ‘Strategic Autonomy and the Transformation of the EU’. Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

McGerty, F. (2025). ‘European Defence Funding: Fiscal Manoeuvres’. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/military-balance/2025/03/european-defence-funding-fiscal-manoeuvres/

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, Organisation du Traité de l’Atlantique Nord (2023). ‘Defence Expenditure of NATO countries (2014-2023)’. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2023/7/pdf/230707-def-exp-2023-en.pdf

Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (2023). SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex